Skip to content

Free tool

Context Window Calculator

Will your document fit? Enter how much text you have — words, pages, characters, or tokens — and see which 2026 models can hold it in a single context window, with the cost to process it once.

66.7K tokens

Fits in 14 of 14 models · cheapest: Llama 4 Maverick at $0.015/run

  • GLM-5Zhipu · 200K context
    $0.040/run
  • Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · 200K context
    $0.067/run
  • Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot · 256K context
    $0.040/run
  • Mistral Large 3Mistral · 256K context
    $0.133/run
  • GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · 400K context
    $0.050/run
  • Llama 4 MaverickMeta · 1M context
    $0.015/run
  • Grok 4.3xAI · 1M context
    $0.083/run
  • Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle · 1M context
    $0.100/run
  • DeepSeek V4DeepSeek · 1M context
    $0.116/run
  • Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · 1M context
    $0.133/run
  • Qwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 1M context
    $0.167/run
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · 1M context
    $0.200/run
  • Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · 1M context
    $0.333/run
  • GPT-5.5OpenAI · 1.05M context
    $0.333/run

Token estimate uses standard heuristics (~4 characters or ~0.75 words per token, ~500 words/page) — actual counts vary by tokenizer and language. Cost is the input price to process your text once (output not included); context windows and prices are a June 2026 snapshot. The full context is rarely free — leave headroom for the reply.

Frequently asked

How many tokens is my document?
A good rule of thumb is ~0.75 words per token, or about 4 characters per token, for typical English text. So 50,000 words is roughly 67,000 tokens, and a 500-word page is about 670 tokens. Code, other languages, and unusual formatting tokenize differently, so treat the estimate as a ballpark, not an exact count.
Which AI model has the biggest context window in 2026?
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the major APIs at 1M+ tokens (up to ~2M reported), with GPT-5.5 (~1.05M), Claude Opus 4.8 / Sonnet 4.6 (1M), Grok 4.3 (1M), and the open Llama 4 Maverick (1M) all near 1M tokens. For very long inputs, watch for context-tiered pricing — several models charge more above ~200K tokens.
Does a bigger context window cost more?
Two ways. First, processing more tokens costs more directly (price × token count), which this tool shows as the per-run input cost. Second, several flagships charge a higher per-token rate once a prompt passes ~200K tokens — so a 500K-token prompt can cost more than 2.5× a 200K one. Always leave headroom for the model's reply, too.
Should I use a huge context window or RAG?
If your text fits comfortably and you query it once or twice, a long context is simplest. If you have a large, mostly-static corpus you query repeatedly, retrieval (RAG) is usually cheaper and faster — you only send the relevant chunks each time instead of paying for the whole document on every call.