Skip to content

Free tool

Which AI Model Should I Use?

Tell us your use case and what matters most (quality, cost, or speed), and get a clear top pick plus two alternatives, with the reasoning and ballpark pricing. No signup.

Top pick. GPT-6 Astra from OpenAI. OpenAI's most capable: complex reasoning, coding, computer use and research.. Also worth a look: Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Top pick

GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI

OpenAI's most capable: complex reasoning, coding, computer use and research.

$10 / $50 per 1M (in/out)

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic

Opus-tier reasoning and agentic coding at half of Fable 5.1's per-token price.

$5 / $25 per 1M (in/out)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

Native multimodal with a 1M window at a low input price.

$2 / $12 per 1M (in/out)

Prices are USD per 1M tokens, dated in the strip below. Closed-model rates are official standard-tier; open-model rates are representative hosted prices; the weights are free to self-host. GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and Grok 4.3 reprice above a long-context threshold; the comparison table carries each one. Confirm live pricing before relying on a figure.

Frequently asked

What's the best AI model for coding in 2026?

For top quality, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10 / $50 per 1M in/out) leads the picker's coding shortlist. For the best value, Grok 4.3 ($1.25 / $2.5 per 1M in/out) is the cheapest managed row on that shortlist. If you want open weights, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.2 / $0.8 per 1M in/out) is the cheapest capable option on the list and is free to self-host.

Which AI model is cheapest?

Among capable hosted models, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.2 / $0.8 per 1M in/out) and GPT-5.4 nano ($0.2 / $1.25 per 1M in/out) are the cheapest rows in the picker, weighted three-to-one toward input price because that is where most bills land. If you self-host open weights instead, token cost is effectively zero and you pay for hardware; the Llama 3.3 70B, Qwen2.5 72B and Mistral Small 3 24B rows are the ones sized for that.

What's the best model I can run fully locally / privately?

For a single consumer GPU, Mistral Small 3 24B is the most practical row here — it is the smallest of them. For more capability on a bigger box, Llama 3.3 70B and Qwen2.5 72B need a high-VRAM card or two. Every one of these is a model the GPU checker can size, so you can price the hardware before you commit to it.

Which model has the biggest context window?

GPT-6 Astra at 1.05M tokens. Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick follow at 1M. For an open, self-hostable flagship, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 1M, Llama 4 Maverick at 1M and Mistral Large 3 at 256K.

Open vs. closed models: when should I pick open weights?

Pick open weights when you need data privacy, on-prem or air-gapped deployment, no per-token fees at scale, or full control; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Large 3 are the open rows the picker knows, alongside the smaller Llama 3.3 70B, Qwen2.5 72B and Mistral Small 3 24B you would run yourself. Pick closed when you want the highest ceiling, native vision, managed reliability and zero ops.

How to pick the right model

There is no single best model; there is the best model for a given task, budget, and constraint. Picking well means matching the model to what the job actually needs rather than always reaching for the largest one.

Match capability to the task

Hard reasoning, long agentic work, and tricky code reward a top-tier model. Classification, extraction, short replies, and high-volume calls usually run just as well on a smaller, cheaper, faster model. Using a frontier model for simple work mostly wastes money and latency.

Weigh cost, speed, and context

Beyond raw quality, models differ in price per token, response speed, context-window size, and whether they are multimodal or open-weight. A cheaper model with a large context can beat a pricier one for document work; a fast small model can beat a slow large one for interactive use.

Open or closed

Open-weight models can run locally for data control and zero per-token cost, at the price of hosting them yourself. Closed API models are simplest to use and often the most capable. The right pick depends on your constraints, not just a benchmark score.

Where this answer comes from

Last checked on Sep 3, 2026, and reviewed on a 45-day schedule. Figures come from the company that publishes them, never from another site’s summary. How we check this.

Related reading

Go deeper on how this works and what to pick.

Newsletter

Liked the tool? Get the signal.

One weekly email on the AI + hardware that actually matters, from the people who build these calculators.

Free · unsubscribe anytime · no spam.